March 17, 2011
NCIP Standing Committee
March 17, 2011 – Conference Call
Present
Mary Jackson – Auto-Graphics
Susan Campbell – CCLA
Rob Walsh – EnvisionWare (Maintenance Agency)
Mike Dicus – Ex Libris (Chair)
Eric Leckbee – Innovative Interfaces
John Bodfish – OCLC
Robert Gray – Polaris / Pilot Consulting
Kevin Stewart – Relais International
Juli Marsh – TLC
Regrets
Tony O’Brien – OCLC
DJ Miller – TLC
Thalia Dickson - TLC
Agenda
I. Implementer Updates
Jackson reported that Auto-Graphics and Polaris have re-engaged their mutual testing efforts with Version 2.
Gray reported that they continue to work with Innovative Interfaces on Version 1.
II. Issues / Concerns / Details for In-Person Meeting in April
a. Anyone for golf Friday?
b. Other
No issues were raised.
III. Location for ALA Social Event
a. Mariott – Convention Center; wine bar, across street from Convention Center
b. Hilton New Orleans Riverside; lobby bar, ALA HQ
c. Other
No preference was given for one location over the other. Walsh and Dicus will pick one. The social event is planned for Sunday, June 26, immediately following the closing of the exhibits (approx. 5 or 5:30 pm).
IV. Karen Wetzel’s departure from NISO
a. New liaison?
b. Other
Cynthia Hodgson will be the contact for anything relating to documents or documentation. The NISO office will handle all logistics and planning concerns.
V. Other New Business
a. Ambiguity around Amount element inside Loaned Item Element
Bodfish raised several issues with the Amount element used inside the Loaned Item Element. First, the Amount element is required when it should be optional. When required, does $0 indicate no fee or no data is available? Bodfish will draft a change request.
Second, the Amount element is ambiguous. Different people interpret it differently. How does the initiator know how to parse the information? This item should be discussed at the April meeting.
Third, information provided in the Amount element might overlap information in the User Fiscal Account element. Like the previous item, there may be no consistency for how this is handled in different implementation. This item, too, should be discussed at the April meeting.
VI. Next Meeting / Call
a. April 20-21, Ottawa
b. No April call
c. May 19, 2011 – 1 pm Eastern
March 17, 2011 – Conference Call
Present
Mary Jackson – Auto-Graphics
Susan Campbell – CCLA
Rob Walsh – EnvisionWare (Maintenance Agency)
Mike Dicus – Ex Libris (Chair)
Eric Leckbee – Innovative Interfaces
John Bodfish – OCLC
Robert Gray – Polaris / Pilot Consulting
Kevin Stewart – Relais International
Juli Marsh – TLC
Regrets
Tony O’Brien – OCLC
DJ Miller – TLC
Thalia Dickson - TLC
Agenda
I. Implementer Updates
Jackson reported that Auto-Graphics and Polaris have re-engaged their mutual testing efforts with Version 2.
Gray reported that they continue to work with Innovative Interfaces on Version 1.
II. Issues / Concerns / Details for In-Person Meeting in April
a. Anyone for golf Friday?
b. Other
No issues were raised.
III. Location for ALA Social Event
a. Mariott – Convention Center; wine bar, across street from Convention Center
b. Hilton New Orleans Riverside; lobby bar, ALA HQ
c. Other
No preference was given for one location over the other. Walsh and Dicus will pick one. The social event is planned for Sunday, June 26, immediately following the closing of the exhibits (approx. 5 or 5:30 pm).
IV. Karen Wetzel’s departure from NISO
a. New liaison?
b. Other
Cynthia Hodgson will be the contact for anything relating to documents or documentation. The NISO office will handle all logistics and planning concerns.
V. Other New Business
a. Ambiguity around Amount element inside Loaned Item Element
Bodfish raised several issues with the Amount element used inside the Loaned Item Element. First, the Amount element is required when it should be optional. When required, does $0 indicate no fee or no data is available? Bodfish will draft a change request.
Second, the Amount element is ambiguous. Different people interpret it differently. How does the initiator know how to parse the information? This item should be discussed at the April meeting.
Third, information provided in the Amount element might overlap information in the User Fiscal Account element. Like the previous item, there may be no consistency for how this is handled in different implementation. This item, too, should be discussed at the April meeting.
VI. Next Meeting / Call
a. April 20-21, Ottawa
b. No April call
c. May 19, 2011 – 1 pm Eastern
